LETTER: Seeking ‘informed consent’

I listened to Frances O’Grady, General Secretary of the TUC, explaining that, when Trade Unions are invited to negotiate on behalf of their members, they first seek to negotiate the best possible deal with employers and then always put this deal back to their members, either for consent or rejection.

I also listened to doctors Philip Lee MP and Sarah Wollaston MP explaining that, as doctors, they always have to secure ‘informed consent’ from patients for every treatment they recommend.

The same applies to Brexit. It requires ‘informed consent’, as it will profoundly affect our rights and future prosperity for generations to come. It’s not like a General Election, when you can vote for a party in one year and then kick them out in five years time. Like a puppy, Brexit is not just for Christmas; it’s for life.

Today, the reality is that:

(a) None of the seductive promises made by Leave campaigners in 2016 have come true (think: sunlit uplands of prosperity; the easiest trade deal in human history; the exact same benefits; they need us more than we need them; we hold all the cards, etc); and

(b) When Theresa May’s negotiated deal was put to Parliament on January 15, 2019, MPs voted by 432 votes to 202 to reject it, the largest ever defeat in Parliamentary history.
Whatever happens between now and 29 March, Theresa May’s deal MUST be put to a public vote for ‘informed consent’, either to accept or reject it.

Alan Meekings
by email

more >

Extra cheer for Portugal tournament plan

16 Jan 2026

Forum criticises state of Spalding parks

15 Jan 2026

Missing person ‘found safe and well’ after search in Spalding

15 Jan 2026

Four to be taken away from South Holland policing team

15 Jan 2026

Pinchbeck road closed after being churned up by drivers avoiding another closure

15 Jan 2026

Two arrested after drugs raid on Spalding home

14 Jan 2026