John Tippler/Richard Garvie (letters Oct 3rd) applied snide indifference when repeating “name and address supplied” while assuming my gender.
How remiss of them. Are they saying by not publishing my name and address my right to express my opinion is somehow unworthy? I must presume them to be leftie-progressives because their tac, lowest common denominator, is embedded in the leftie-progressives mindset.
I voted for Sir John. However, conspicuous, absence of opposition to Starmer from our MPs is by, act of omission, giving support to him.
Farage won five seats, a remarkable achievement considering his start base.
I wonder why Starmer PM is widely known as “Two-Tier”? Perhaps John Garvie and Richard Tippler are oblivious to the bombardment of reporting on this over recent weeks.
I have never known a PM so despised in such a short time from election and post-conference. Don’t they think there is a reason for this? I wonder why? Perhaps Mr Tippler and Mr Garvie want the names and addresses of all voters.
Starmer won with the lowest voter turnout since 1928. He received fewer votes than Jeremy Corbyn. Of course, I was very happy the person I voted for won his seat…Sir John.
The “Black Swan” effect exists in the minds of Mr Tippler and Mr Garvie. They seem to think Reform does not exist because they have not seen a surge in South Holland.
Starmer has directly navigated the tiller in regard to Two-Tier policing. We have seen people arrested for waving our Union Flag while others wave a different flag with banners and shouting of incitement to kill and harm and disrupt. Repeated over many weeks.
I find it incredulous that “name and town supplied x2” speak as if all is fine and dandy. Who did you vote for? Who do you support? Information I HAVE supplied.
Name and address supplied
