Ex-journalist Andrew Brookes gives his take on the hustings for the South Holland and The Deepings seat in Spalding on April 23:
Unlike the national leader face-offs, this was not suffocated by spin and soundbites but was a refreshing debate epitomised by its youngest contender.
The Green Party’s Dan Wilshire (19) impressed in a performance which was self-deprecating, honest, interesting and informed – speaking from the heart, without resorting to reciting party-approved clichés and belying his age.
It would’ve stood him in better stead if we had a voting system where your second choice is listed.
In truth, his is an impossible mission and the “safety” of the seat was perhaps what caused a distinct lack of direct attacks to incumbent John Hayes from anyone.
Labour’s Matthew Mahabadi tried instead to attack UKIP’s David Parsons’ past but never really landed a blow and was better when passionately outlining his own hopes and aspirations.
Parsons made a plea to be champion of a “different politics” but, when Wilshire was clearly offering that too, it fell flat.
The UKIP man was at his strongest challenging Hayes on an EU referendum but John – to much support – turned that around by promising to resign from a future Government if David Cameron reneged.
Beyond that, the experienced Hayes gave a statesmanlike showing in which he looked to reassure voters that he understood their feelings and knew what he must do to help them.
The Lib Dems’ George Smid also spoke honestly – although does he really believe under-11s don’t need good teachers? – drawing on his personal experience in coming to the UK. These moments were interesting if not particularly vote-inspiring.
Big credit must go to all involved (particularly host Winston Brown) for doing South Holland proud.
